Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
EHS › Low-Neutron & Waste
Low-Neutron & Waste

Where the Burner's Neutrons Come From

The burner's 5.44% neutron output comes from D-D side reactions and the D-T that D-D breeding feeds, not from the main D-³He channel.

In a deuterium–helium-3 plasma the intended reaction is D + ³He → ⁴He (3.6 MeV) + p (14.7 MeV). Both products are charged, so direct energy conversion can recover them and no neutron is made. The neutrons that do appear come from unavoidable competing reactions among the deuterium ions.

The two side channels

The relative rates depend on ion temperature and the deuterium fraction. The design deliberately runs helium-3-rich and hot to suppress the D–D rate, but it cannot reach zero. The net of both channels is the 5.44% neutron energy fraction quoted for the design point.

Neutron sources inside the D–³He plasmaD–³He (no neutron)D–³He (no neutron)D–D direct 2.45 MeV n (2.80%)D–T secondary 14.1 MeV n (2.64%)Illustrative split of the 5.44% neutron channel between the two side reactions; exact ratio is temperature-dependent.

Design levers

The tritium bred in situ by the D–D path is a subtle point worth stating plainly: the burner makes a little of its own tritium, which then burns and adds 14.1 MeV neutrons. This internal breeding is small but is part of why the neutron fraction cannot be driven to zero in any real deuterium plasma.

Two knobs reduce the neutron fraction: raising ion temperature (which favors D–³He over D–D) and lowering the deuterium-to-helium-3 ratio. Both are constrained by the plug and confinement physics, and the burner's operating regime is far beyond any existing device, so the 5.44% figure is a simulation target, not a demonstrated value. Reducing it further trades against fuel supply and confinement, which is why the honest number is stated rather than an aspirational zero.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage