Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Kronos Fusion Energy

Research & Publications

The Kronos 2026 design series — 44 open papers spanning the spherical-tokamak breeder, the D–³He tandem-mirror burner, magnets, direct energy conversion, AI & quantum control, and the physics de-risking programme — each paired with a reproducible, openly-archived Zenodo deposit, and available as one complete volume.

Status. Design-and-simulation stage; open, no economics. Every paper carries a reserved Zenodo DOI (drafts that resolve unchanged on publication). The spherical-tokamak breeder and the tandem-mirror generator are under review at Nuclear Fusion (IOP); the AI & quantum control study at Fusion Engineering & Design (Elsevier). Live in-browser physics simulators accompany the breeder and generator.

Every headline number regenerates from a named script and archived data under a fixed random seed; requirement-class assumptions and open risks are carried openly rather than absorbed into a single optimum. Each paper below has its own reading edition (the editorial), linking the manuscript to its data-and-code deposit, the interactive 3D model, and the live verification simulator.

The complete volume

The Kronos 2026 Publication — Complete Volume

All studies in one bound volume: the compact fusion isotope-and-energy platform, front to back — breeder, generator, magnets, direct energy conversion, AI/quantum control and the full de-risking programme — with the shared methodology, notation and reproducibility manifest that ties them together.

Register

the hub · Paper 1.0
Paper 1.0
Physics De-Risking Register

The Kronos Physics De-Risking Register — 154 gates, 70 breakthroughs, honest closure

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

The hub of the series: a public, crawlable register that states every binding physics gate for the breeder and the burner, the campaign breakthroughs, the honest closure statement, and the companion-deposit DOI table that ties all 44 papers together.

Open the register →doi:22133057Zenodo · reserved draft

Phase 1 — Foundational

5 papers · 1.1–1.5

The five foundational studies: the breeder, the generator, the magnets, direct energy conversion, and the control stack.

Paper 1.1
Hyperion — compact ST tritium/He-3 breeder

Hyperion — The Tritium Foundry

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Hyperion is a compact negative-triangularity spherical-tokamak breeder that earns on fusion gain alone producing tritium, decay helium-3, and 14 MeV neutrons so it delivers value without waiting on the net-electricity milestone the rest of the field is chasing. At the frozen reference point it reaches Q = 3.0763 at 85.04 MW and 9.66 MA, with negative triangularity cutting ion-scale transport by 40–45% into a quiet subcritical core. The tritium output…

Paper 1.2
Aegis / MetroVolt — D–3He tandem-mirror burner

Aegis & MetroVolt — The Generator

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Aegis and MetroVolt are two application housings of one deuterium helium-3 tandem mirror. Its principal new result: synchrotron reabsorption is not a fixed fraction of fusion power but scales with machine size. At the design point the engineering gain is Q E 1.318 at a low neutron fraction of 5.44% low-neutron, never aneutronic. Closure is requirement-class, not demonstrated: it needs an end-plug density ratio of 16, stated as the design s largest open…

Paper 1.3
High-field REBCO magnets & tape

High-Field REBCO Magnets & Tape — Bore-Resolved Mechanics

P. I. Ford, R. J. Weggel, D. K. Weggel · Kronos Fusion Energy

The magnet paper does one thing carefully and applies it twice: bore-resolved hoop stress, which scales with the winding bore exactly what worst-case derating hides. Applied to the two machines, the binding constraint flips: the breeder s centre-post is stress-comfortable, while the burner s small-bore plug coil, once feared infeasible as a bare winding, is resolved by a stress-managed structural shield at a healthy strain margin. Two claims are kept…

Paper 1.4
Direct energy conversion — quasineutral expander

Direct Energy Conversion — A Quasineutral Expander

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

For a deuterium helium-3 magnetic-mirror burner, the directed axial power splits 55.5% into the electron channel and 44.5% into the ion channel so the electron stream, not the ion stream, is the larger prize, and the inversion holds across 20 200 keV. No published converter recovers directed electrons. A quasineutral two-species expander (field ratio ~20) lifts axial electric recovery by ~13% (~97 MW e ) at converter efficiency 0.7. The upside is…

Paper 1.5
AI, ML & quantum control

AI, ML & Quantum Control — Certifiable Real-Time Control

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

Real-time control of a nuclear-regulated fusion generator is treated as a layered digital-twin architecture in which physics-informed machine learning is deployable now but only inside a deterministically clamped safe set. A control-barrier filter permits 0 safety-set escapes across 5000 trajectories against 5000 unfiltered, backed by an analytic proof. Quantum sensing is a near-term diagnostic tier; quantum computation is an offline calibration tier…

Phase 2 — Companion

38 papers · 2.1–2.39

Companion studies that pin each binding gate individually — from the consumable centrepost and the blanket breeding ladder to disruptions, the helium-3 cycle, licensing and buildability.

Paper 2.1
Centrepost & magnet integrity

The Consumable Centrepost — A Maintenance Line Item, Not a Barrier

P. I. Ford, R. J. Weggel, D. K. Weggel · Kronos Fusion Energy

The inboard centrepost is the defining vulnerability of a compact spherical-tokamak breeder, and it is handled here as a consumable, scheduled-replacement cartridge rather than a lifetime component. Four coupled analyses on the frozen design point close it: a 3-D coverage-versus-protection neutronics scan, a coil structural finite-element check against the analytic Lam stress, a fused strain-rate-plus-magnetization quench detector, and a…

Paper 2.2
Blanket tritium-breeding lever

The Blanket Breeding Lever — From 0.86 to the Confirmed Ceiling

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The tritium breeding ratio of a compact spherical-tokamak breeder is a design lever, not a fixed number. Three-dimensional OpenMC neutronics on ENDF/B-VIII.0 place it: a bare lithium blanket gives net TBR about 0.86; a solid-beryllium multiplier raises it into the low-1.1s; and an advanced blanket reaches net TBR 1.42, the confirmed per-unit ceiling, reproducing across an independent nuclear-data library to under 0.3%.

Paper 2.3
Centrepost fluence & shielding

Centrepost Fluence & Cartridge Life — Shielding Traded Against Coverage

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Coupled OpenMC neutronics book the centrepost fast fluence, displacement damage, and consumable-cartridge life against a tungsten-carbide shield whose thickness trades directly against machine size and breeding coverage. The design damage rate is 18.85 dpa per full-power-year; the mid-current operating point extends the life. The centrepost is a scheduled-replacement cartridge, stated as such.

Paper 2.4
Verification & validation (47-code provenance)

Verification & Validation — Frozen Anchors, Independently Reproduced

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

This paper states the verification-and-validation discipline used across the Kronos 2026 series: frozen, evidence-tagged anchors regenerable from deposited code, a two-tier reproducibility standard, and an independent re-run on separate hardware and an independent nuclear-data library. The load-bearing three-dimensional tritium breeding ratio reproduces across ENDF/B-VIII.0 and FENDL-3.2 to within 0.3 percent.

Paper 2.5
RF alpha-channeling

RF Alpha-Channeling — A Bounded Power Lever

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

In a deuterium-helium-3 mirror the fusion-born fast ions carry most of the released energy. RF alpha-channeling resonant waves that extract energy from the fast ions and hand it to the fuel while expelling the ash raises the recoverable charged fraction from a collisional baseline near 8 percent to about 80 percent in the worked embodiment, easing the recirculating-power burden that sets the engineering gain. It is booked as a bounded lever; the plug…

Paper 2.6
DCLC loss-cone microstability

Loss-Cone Microstability — On the Stabilization Knee

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A flute-mode electrostatic dispersion solver, cross-checked electromagnetically, maps the exact marginal-stability boundary of the deuterium-helium-3 tandem-mirror plug. The design s warm-ion fill sits exactly on the stabilization knee: it clears the drift-cyclotron loss-cone mode only for sufficiently broad plug-edge gradients, with a weak residual cyclotron mode. Marginal but bounded, and quantified.

Paper 2.7
Control-barrier safety clamp

The Safety Clamp — A Provable Zero-Escape Guarantee

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

A deterministic, control-barrier-certified safety clamp provides a provable zero-escape guarantee for the compact spherical-tokamak breeder operating envelope. A robust, disturbance-tightened control-barrier-function filter with a closed-form separable solution wraps an arbitrary controller: 0 of 5000 Monte-Carlo trajectories escape the safe set with the clamp versus 5000 of 5000 without it, backed by an analytic forward-invariance proof.

Paper 2.8
Quantum computing for fusion

Quantum Computing for Fusion — With Honest Resource Estimates

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

Landau damping is reproduced on a 5-qubit Hamiltonian-simulation circuit; adaptive variational quantum chemistry reaches chemical accuracy on candidate fusion-alloy fragments; and a resource frontier separates the tractable linear kinetic operator (early fault-tolerant, 11-19 logical qubits) from the nonlinear gyrokinetic problem (fault-tolerant horizon). Noisy hardware shows no advantage today; classical gyrokinetics remains cheaper at every…

Paper 2.9
Red-team of the binding gates

Red-Teaming the Gates — Attacking the Binding Constraints

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A reduced-order red-team of the binding gates of the compact breeder and the tandem-mirror burner. For each honest negative, alternatives are brainstormed, bounded, ranked, and only the promising ones promoted to high-fidelity validation. The current-drive burden falls 58 percent below fusion power inside unused pressure headroom; tritium closure is restored independent of the beryllium multiplier; and the burner plug-density requirement is attacked by…

Paper 2.11
Negative-triangularity confinement

Negative-Triangularity Confinement — A Quiet, Subcritical Core

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Nonlinear CGYRO with kinetic electrons at the frozen negative-triangularity design point shows negative triangularity cutting ion-scale ITG+TEM transport by 40–45 percent versus a positive-triangularity twin, with the operating point quiet and subcritical; electron-scale runs show 79–80 percent ETG suppression. The direction is corroborated against the TCV and DIII-D negative-triangularity campaigns; reduced-mass and design-target caveats are stated…

Paper 2.12
Disruptions & runaway electrons

Disruptions & Runaway Electrons — A Hard Requirement, Not a Footnote

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A reduced-order assessment of disruptions, runaway electrons, and electromagnetic loads on a NIMROD-verified equilibrium. The current-quench time is 7-19 ms; the runaway-electron avalanche is severe (E/E_c about 1128, a beam of order 70 percent of plasma current); the halo current is 35 percent of plasma current. The conclusion is a hard design requirement: shattered-pellet-class disruption mitigation triggered within the current-quench window. The…

Paper 2.13
Alpha / fast-product confinement

Fast-Product Confinement — Where the Charged Power Goes

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Fast-alpha and fusion-product confinement in the deuterium-helium-3 tandem-mirror burner. The mirror-trapped charged products and their loss-cone dynamics set the ash accumulation and the axial power that the direct-energy-conversion and alpha-channeling systems must handle. Reported with its confinement caveats.

Paper 2.14
Helium-3 fuel cycle

The Helium-3 Fuel Cycle — A Co-Product, Honestly Gated

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The helium-3 half of the breeder fuel cycle: helium-3 bred as a co-product of surplus-tritium decay at equilibrium, distinct from bulk fuel supply. The 12.3-year tritium half-life makes the breeder s decay-sourced helium-3 far too slow to fuel a burner fleet (~192/105/45 breeders per burner), so burner-scale helium-3 is lunar-gated; the breeder s helium-3 is a strategic co-product with national-security, cryogenic, and quantum value.

Paper 2.15
Ideal-MHD stability

Ideal-MHD Stability — Margins Carried Openly

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Ideal-MHD stability of the compact negative-triangularity spherical-tokamak breeder at the frozen design point. The equilibrium is ideal-MHD-stable with quantified margins against the binding kink and ballooning limits, carried openly.

Paper 2.16
Divertor portfolio

The Divertor Portfolio — Options Ranked Against the Load

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A portfolio assessment of divertor and heat-exhaust options for the compact breeder, spanning conventional, advanced-magnetic, and liquid-metal targets, ranked against the concentrated exhaust power of a compact machine. The flowing-lithium vapor-box option is developed in a dedicated companion. Screening bounds, honest gates carried.

Paper 2.17
Low-activation alloys

Low-Activation Materials — A Low-Level-Waste Target

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Low-activation structural-material selection for the compact fusion platform: reduced-activation steels and their activation, decay-heat, and waste-classification behaviour under the 14 MeV spectrum, targeting a low-level-waste class and short-cooldown maintenance. Material-selection targets pending qualification.

Paper 2.18
Tritium fuel cycle & breeding ladder

The Tritium Fuel Cycle — A Breeding Ladder, Not a Number

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A breeder s product is tritium, and its credibility rests on an honest mass balance. The per-unit burn rate is fixed by the fusion power at 4.76 kg-T per full-power-year, and the net surplus is a confirmed ladder : net TBR ~1.06 (literal recipe), ~1.19 (solid-beryllium layer), and 1.42 (advanced blanket, ~2.0 kg-T/yr per unit) the last the confirmed per-unit ceiling, above which the spherical-tokamak centrepost caps the inboard coverage. A single…

Paper 2.19
Flowing-lithium vapor-box divertor

The Flowing-Lithium Divertor — Heat Exhaust Meets the Fuel Cycle

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A flowing-lithium vapor-box divertor for the compact breeder that couples heat exhaust to the fuel cycle. Coupled FESTIM/TMAP permeation-retention modelling ranks four liquid metals by tritium loss: lithium is optimal by three to six orders of magnitude over lithium-tin, lead-lithium, and tin, so the best power-handling surface is also the best inventory-control surface. An internal-platform concept, not a built system.

Paper 2.20
Quench detection & NV sensing

Early Quench Detection — Firing Before the Voltage

P. I. Ford, R. J. Weggel, D. K. Weggel · Kronos Fusion Energy

The unsolved protection problem of high-temperature-superconductor fusion magnets is that REBCO quenches propagate too slowly for voltage detection to act before local damage. A fused-detector scheme on two prompt precursors local strain rate and magnetization change fires at 0.089 s against a voltage-threshold 3.024 s, a lead of 2.935 s at signal-to-noise ratio 322.5, cutting the MIITs the winding must survive. An in-winding nitrogen-vacancy…

Paper 2.21
Inherent-safety & environmental case

The Safety Case — Bounded Hazards, Stated Plainly

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Fusion s safety advantages are real but are often asserted rather than bounded. The dominant radiological hazard is the mobilizable tritium inventory, minimized by direct internal recycling rather than a large buffered store; the standing-inventory value that sets the source term is computed in the fuel-cycle model, not asserted. There is no fission-product inventory and no chain reaction, so an unmitigated loss of control cannot produce a runaway or a…

Paper 2.22
Licensing (byproduct material, Part 30)

Licensing as Byproduct Material — A Framework That Fits

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Following the 2023 NRC determination and the ADVANCE Act, fusion energy systems in the United States are regulated as byproduct material (10 CFR Part 30), not under the reactor framework. That framework is materials-oriented and Agreement-State-administrable, giving a graded, hazard-proportionate path suited to a machine whose dominant hazard is a bounded tritium inventory and which has no fission-product source term or criticality mechanism. A…

Paper 2.23
Current drive & bootstrap

Current Drive & Bootstrap — The Recirculating Cost, Stated

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A steady-state breeder must sustain its plasma current non-inductively, and the recirculating power to do so is a real charge. At the frozen operating point the pressure-driven bootstrap current self-generates about 15.5 percent of the plasma current and external non-inductive drive supplies the remaining 8.16 MA, its wall-plug power a named line in the recirculating budget. The bootstrap fraction is a lever, stated modestly.

Paper 2.24
Solenoid-free startup

Solenoid-Free Startup — Growing the Current Without a Transformer

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A spherical tokamak has almost no room for a central solenoid, so it cannot start its plasma current the way a conventional tokamak does. The current is initiated by outboard induction, electron-cyclotron heating, and a helicity or beam seed, then handed off to the non-inductive and bootstrap currents that hold the flat-top. The ramp auxiliary power and profile-control hand-off are flagged as carried risks. A shorter synthesis paper.

Paper 2.25
Isotopes & 14 MeV applications

Isotopes & Materials Qualification — The Neutron, Put to Work

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A breeder is a strong 14 MeV neutron source, and that source has value beyond tritium. The design delivers a full-rate fast-neutron materials-qualification capability about 59 times the reference dedicated facility, in a true fusion spectrum; and it breeds shortage-prone medical isotopes such as molybdenum-99 without a fission reactor. Strategic-material co-products booked as capability, not revenue.

Paper 2.26
Integrated platform overview

The Integrated Platform — One Architecture, Two Machines

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Kronos is not one machine but a platform: a compact negative-triangularity spherical-tokamak breeder that supplies tritium, helium-3, 14 MeV neutrons, and co-produced isotopes, and a deuterium helium-3 burner in two housings that supplies power at Q E 1.318 with a neutron fraction of only 5.44%. The two share a REBCO magnet basis and a single physics de-risking record, and they close a strategic loop. We state closure in two tiers throughout…

Paper 2.27
Advanced-fuel scorecard

The Advanced-Fuel Scorecard — Physics, Not the Aneutronic Ideal

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

Fuel choice is the most consequential decision in a fusion program, and it is often made emotionally toward the aneutronic ideal rather than on the physics. We grade the four candidate fuels on one ruler: reactivity, temperature, neutron fraction, tritium logistics, availability, and demonstrated gain. No fuel wins on every axis. The Kronos architecture follows the scorecard, not the ideal: run deuterium tritium where the product is the neutron and the…

Paper 2.28
Tensor-network kinetic solver

The Tensor-Network Kinetic Solver — Classical, Deployable Today

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

The kinetic distribution function is highly compressible in a low-rank tensor-network representation, and that yields a practical classical solver, not a storage trick. On a 1D1V BGK test, a matrix-product-state truncation reaches relative-L² error 2 10 at rank 8 using ~0.19 the dense storage, with the error falling exponentially in rank. Unlike the fault-tolerant-horizon quantum route, this runs today.

Paper 2.29
Synchrotron radiation transport

Synchrotron Radiation Transport — What Pins the Burner Temperature

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

A hot deuterium helium-3 mirror loses more power to electron-cyclotron emission than to any other channel, and that loss pins the optimal electron temperature. A first-principles transport calculation gives a reabsorbed synchrotron loss of 1803 MW against a 2546 MW radiated scale versus 919 MW (Trubnikov) and 66,677 MW optically-thin, a near-two-order model spread it collapses. The plasma is optically thick to n* 10.4, and the loss fraction falls with…

Paper 2.30
First-wall neutron-damage lifetime

First-Wall Damage Lifetime — How Long the Wall Survives

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The survival question, computed on an independent code stack: displacement damage (~9.78 dpa/fpy behind armor), helium/hydrogen bubble swelling (accumulating but not life-limiting), plasma-material sputtering/erosion, and hydrogenic permeation. The governing life-limiter is displacement-driven embrittlement, and the wall is a scheduled-replacement component on a defined damage budget.

Paper 2.31
Nuclear-data UQ for the TBR

The TBR Error Bar — Which Cross-Sections Actually Matter

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

The credible nuclear-data uncertainty on the TBR is set by the light breeding channels Li(n,t), Li(n,n't), Be(n,2n) show a 55 66% TALYS-vs-ENDF model spread at 14 MeV, against ~15% for heavy structural channels. The load-bearing light channels must come from evaluated covariances, not model defaults.

Paper 2.32
REBCO conductor materials under irradiation

Conductor Materials Under Irradiation — The Neutron Environment Selects the Tape

P. I. Ford, R. J. Weggel, D. K. Weggel · Kronos Fusion Energy

The magnet's survival in a neutron environment is a materials question that changes the conductor specification. Four results: the un-doped REBCO tape outlasts the doped (artificial-pinning) tape for fusion fluence; a J c -onset-knee surrogate screens candidates; a graphene-reinforced aluminum stabilizer retains ~2 10 S/cm at cryogenic temperature in 30 35 T; and a V O self-protecting quench interlayer gives passive turn-to-turn protection.

Paper 2.33
ECH thermal-barrier decoupling

Thermal-Barrier Decoupling — The Cornerstone Plug Mechanism

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The plug's electrostatic potential is the burner's binding gate. A thermal barrier a local density/potential depression sustained by ECH hot electrons and sloshing ions decouples the plug potential from the central-cell electrons: the ion-confining-potential requirement drops from 248.75 keV to 167.9 keV (a 33% gate cut), hot-electron heating removes ~1093 MW of central-cell ECH, and in the aggressive limit Q E rises from ~1.3 toward 3 5.

Paper 2.34
MetroVolt HVDC-native power interface

The HVDC-Native Power Interface — MetroVolt to the Data-Center Bus

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

A fusion generator built around direct energy conversion is intrinsically a high-voltage DC source. About 54% of gross output leaves the converter as DC at 50 250 kV, reaching an 800 V rack bus in 2 3 power-electronic stages (vs 4 5 for an AC plant). Load-following belongs on the ms-class electronic path: a 4.14 gross/net amplifier makes plasma throttling expensive. Economics/siting held internal.

Paper 2.35
Supply chain & fleet buildability

Supply Chain & Buildability — Can It Be Built at Fleet Rate

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The compact breeder's buildability on engineering grounds (cost held internal): the longest-lead item is 90%-enriched lithium-6, but the neutronics meet the breeding target at 30 60 at% Li moving the hardest item off the critical path. The centrepost is a scheduled-replacement cartridge on a ~10 15 unit/yr line, converting a manufacturing risk into a production-rate spec.

Paper 2.36
Centrepost prognostics & RUL control

Prognostics for the Consumable Centrepost — Knowing When to Replace It

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

A prognostics-and-health-management framework turns the centrepost's fluence-driven degradation into a scheduled-replacement decision with quantified confidence: a dual-channel remaining-useful-life estimator fuses a physics fluence model with an in-situ damage observable, guarded by an out-of-distribution backstop that defaults to the conservative physics bound when signals leave the trained regime.

Paper 2.37
Maturity-gated actuation authority

Maturity-Gated Actuation Authority — Trust Earned by Evidence

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

A control-governance principle that makes trust quantitative: the actuation authority a controller or AI is permitted at runtime is a monotone function of the verification-and-validation maturity (PCMM level) of the underlying models. Machine-validated subsystems admit wide, fast authority; reduced-order ones are clamped to reversible actions an auditable rule where authority expands only as evidence does.

Paper 2.38
ML-potential materials-discovery pipeline

The Materials-Discovery Pipeline — Activation as a First-Class Filter

P. I. Ford · Kronos Fusion Energy

The method behind the low-activation alloy family: a three-stage GPU pipeline a universal ML interatomic potential (CHGNet) screens thousands of compositions by formation energy, density-functional theory confirms the survivors, and an activation-transport down-select (OpenMC FISPACT) rejects any whose waste class or decay heat is unacceptable. The novelty is making activation a first-class filter, early.

Paper 2.39
Admissible operating-window synthesis

The Admissible Operating Window — Which Constraints Actually Bind

P. I. Ford, G. L. Kulcinski · Kronos Fusion Energy

The operating window synthesized from two findings: a strict invariance source strength and wall loading trade one-for-one against centrepost life across the whole density temperature plane, so there is no free operating-point gain and a coupled admissible-current window whose floor is the q95/MHD edge and ceiling the centrepost fluence, with the tritium-startup requirement non-binding at ~1.7 margin.

Reproducibility. Each deposit is Open Access (CC BY 4.0) in the Kronos Fusion Energy Zenodo community and carries a run-all reproduction driver, a pinned computing environment, and per-file checksums. Reserved DOIs are private drafts that resolve unchanged at doi.org once published. The papers contain no financial or commercial information.

Watch the films

All films on the Kronos Fusion Energy channel →