Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryValidation & Reproducibility
Validation & Reproducibility

The Burner Validation Suite

The burner's 45-check suite is honest about the one thing that gates it.

Validation & ReproducibilityUpdated 2026-08-11

The burner deposit ships 45 checks (H41–H80) that exercise the D–³He operating point — the fuel trajectory, the power ledger that yields QE = 1.31 with neutron fraction 5.44%, and the closure conditions across the three product housings.

Crucially, the suite carries the design's central caveat rather than hiding it: net-positive operation is requirement-class, contingent on a plug-to-central density ratio near 16. At a lower ratio the machine does not close, and the suite says so.

Checks45
Engineering gain1.31
Neutron fraction5.44%
Plug-density requirementn_p/n_c ≈ 16
DepositDOI 10.5281/zenodo.21746479
Requirement, not resultThe burner's net power depends on reaching the plug-density requirement. Until a plug demonstration achieves it, closure is a target the suite defines, not an outcome it measures.

Common questions

What is the burner validation suite?

The open engines and cases that reproduce the burner's design point (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21746479) — its QE = 1.31, neutron fraction 5.44%, and the three product housings.

Does it include the honest caveat?

Yes — the suite reproduces the requirement-class net power contingent on the ~16 plug-density ratio, not an unconditional claim.

← PreviousThe Breeder Validation SuiteNext →Tier-1 and Tier-2 Reproduction
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage