Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryCompetitive Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Confinement Approaches Compared

Magnetic (tokamak, stellarator, mirror), inertial, and hybrid — the main routes to fusion.

Competitive LandscapeUpdated 2026-08-11
Magnetic
Tokamak · stellarator · mirror
Inertial
Pulsed compression

The routes to fusion divide first by how the fuel is held: magnetic confinement (tokamaks, stellarators, mirrors) holds a steady plasma in a magnetic bottle; inertial confinement compresses fuel pellets in fast pulses; hybrid and alternative concepts explore the space between. Each implies very different engineering.

Kronos uses magnetic confinement in two forms — a spherical tokamak for the breeder and a tandem mirror for the burner — choosing each geometry for the job it does.

Common questions

What are the main fusion approaches?

Magnetic confinement (tokamaks, stellarators, mirrors), inertial confinement (lasers), and hybrids. Kronos uses two magnetic forms: a spherical tokamak and a tandem mirror.

Next →Deuterium–Tritium vs Advanced Fuels
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage