Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryEngineering & Subsystems
Engineering & Subsystems

The Burner Design Point

The full D–³He burner operating point, across all three product housings.

Engineering & SubsystemsUpdated 2026-08-11
Q_E
1.31
Neutron fraction
5.44%
Temperature
90 keV
Plug field
26.49 T
Requirement
n_p/n_c 16
Deposit
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21746479

The burner's frozen point (Mode M): QE = 1.31, neutron fraction 5.44%, ion temperature 90 keV (electrons 89.78 keV), density 2.6e20 m^-3, ³He fraction 0.30, central beta 0.55, central-cell radius 0.86 m, DEC efficiency 0.70, plug field 26.49 T (throat 17 T).

The same physics scales in length across three housings: 55 m → +104 MWe (0.537 GW thermal-class), 440 m → +850 MWe (4.298 GW), and 1400 m → +2832 MWe (13.678 GW) — MetroVolt-scale.

Why the burner scales by length

The burner's headline figures — engineering gain QE = 1.31 and neutron fraction 5.44% — are largely independent of the central cell's length, because they are set by the plasma's local physics, not the machine's size. That is what lets one physics core serve three products: 55 m delivering +104 MWe, 440 m delivering +850 MWe, and 1400 m delivering +2832 MWe. Longer machines simply produce proportionally more net power.

The point runs D–³He at 90 keV ion temperature (electrons 89.78 keV), density 2.6e20 m^-3, ³He fraction 0.30, central beta 0.55 and central-cell radius 0.86 m. The escaping charged particles are recovered by direct energy conversion at 0.70 efficiency — no steam cycle.

The binding conditionEvery net-power figure here is contingent on the plug reaching a plug-to-central density ratio near 16. Kronos labels the burner's net power requirement-class for exactly this reason.
The D–³He tandem-mirror generator — axial layout, end to end.
The D–³He tandem-mirror generator — axial layout, end to end.
Engineering power balance of the tandem-mirror generator.
Engineering power balance of the tandem-mirror generator.
Synchrotron effective-harmonic cutoff scales with machine size.
Synchrotron effective-harmonic cutoff scales with machine size.

Common questions

What is the burner's engineering gain?

QE = 1.31 at a neutron fraction of 5.44% — low-neutron, not aneutronic. It is a requirement-class figure contingent on the plug-density condition.

How does one design serve three products?

Gain and neutron fraction are length-independent, so the same physics core is packaged at 55 m, 440 m (AEGIS) and 1400 m (MetroVolt) to hit different power classes.

← PreviousThe Breeder Design PointNext →The Burner's Central Cell
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage