Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryProcess & Methodology
Process & Methodology

From Model to Shadow to Digital Twin

Today's model is a design instrument; tomorrow's is a mirror of a running machine. Kronos is explicit about the difference.

Process & MethodologyUpdated 2026-08-11

Kronos frames three stages of fidelity. The model is today's interactive, physics-grounded design instrument. A shadow would run alongside early hardware, fed by test data. A digital twin would mirror an operating machine in real time. The public 3D model is honest that it is stage one.

Not yet a twinThe interactive model is a schematic design tool. Calling it a 'digital twin' before hardware exists would overstate it — so Kronos does not.

Common questions

What is the model-to-shadow-to-twin progression?

A design model becomes a shadow that tracks a real machine's data, and finally a digital twin kept in step with the operating plant — increasing fidelity as hardware comes online.

Where is Kronos on that path?

At the reproducible design-model stage, with the open engines and interactive simulator — the twin comes as real machines are built and instrumented.

← PreviousDesigning with MarginsNext →Gate Reviews (G1–G4)
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage