Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryPhysics & Fusion Science
Physics & Fusion Science

Fusion Fuel Cycles Compared

There is no single best fusion fuel — only the right fuel for the job. Kronos runs two of them, on purpose.

Physics & Fusion ScienceUpdated 2026-08-11

The Kronos thesis is that fuel should follow purpose. The breeder uses neutron-rich D–T to make tritium and neutrons; the burner uses low-neutron D–³He to make electricity cleanly and directly.

D–THighest reactivity; 79.7% neutrons; breeds tritium
D–³HeLow-neutron (5.44%); direct conversion; needs 90 keV
D–DDeuterium-only; no breeding; highest performance demand
The strategy'Fuel follows purpose, not platform' — the breeder and burner are optimised for different fuels because they do different jobs.

Common questions

Why does Kronos use two different fuels?

Fuel follows purpose. The breeder uses neutron-rich D–T to make fuel and isotopes; the burner uses low-neutron D–³He to make firm power via direct conversion. Each fuel is matched to what the machine sells.

Which fuel is 'best'?

There is no universal best — D–T is easiest but neutron-heavy; D–³He is cleaner but far harder to ignite and needs scarce helium-3. Kronos treats the choice as application-specific, not ideological.

← PreviousEnd Loss and Plugging in MirrorsNext →Fusion Gain (Q) and Engineering Gain
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage