Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryPhysics & Fusion Science
Physics & Fusion Science

End Loss and Plugging in Mirrors

Why open-ended mirrors leak, and how the tandem-mirror plug fixes it.

Physics & Fusion ScienceUpdated 2026-08-11
Problem
Open-end leakage
Solution
Ambipolar plug
Requirement
n_p/n_c 16

A simple magnetic mirror leaks plasma out its open ends. The tandem mirror solves this by placing dense, high-field plugs at each end whose electrostatic (ambipolar) potential repels escaping ions. Building that potential requires the plug to reach a density about 16× the central cell — the burner's binding requirement.

Understanding end loss is understanding both the burner's advantage (no disruptions, direct conversion) and its central gate.

Common questions

What is end loss in a mirror?

Particles whose velocity falls in the loss cone escape out the ends of a mirror, the fundamental leak of the simple configuration. Controlling it is the central problem of mirror confinement.

How does the burner plug the ends?

With high-field plug coils and an ambipolar electrostatic potential that reflects escaping ions. The plugging effectiveness hinges on the ~16 plug-density ratio, the burner's binding physics condition.

← PreviousDisruption PhysicsNext →Fusion Fuel Cycles Compared
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage