Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
Technical LibraryCompetitive Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Deuterium–Tritium vs Advanced Fuels

The field's central fuel divide — and why Kronos runs both sides of it.

Competitive LandscapeUpdated 2026-08-11
Mainstream
D–T
Advanced
D–³He, p–¹¹B
Kronos
Both, by purpose

Most fusion uses D–T for its unmatched reactivity, accepting a heavy neutron load (79.7%) and a steam cycle. A minority pursue low-neutron 'advanced' fuels (D–³He, p–¹¹B) for cleaner operation and direct conversion, accepting much higher temperatures. The two camps rarely overlap.

Kronos runs both: D–T in the breeder to make fuel and neutrons, and low-neutron D–³He in the burner to make clean electricity — capturing each fuel's advantage where it fits.

Common questions

Is D–T or an advanced fuel better?

D–T is easiest but neutron-heavy; advanced fuels like D–³He are cleaner but far harder and need scarce helium-3. Kronos uses each where it wins: D–T to breed, D–³He to burn.

Are 'aneutronic' fuel claims trustworthy?

Be careful with them — even D–³He produces some neutrons via side reactions (5.44% in the burner). Kronos never calls its burner aneutronic, only low-neutron.

← PreviousConfinement Approaches ComparedNext →How to Compare Fusion Programmes Honestly
Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage