KRONOS·FUSION
Learn › Comparisons & deep-dives
Comparison
Aegis / MetroVolt burner · design render
Aegis / MetroVolt burner · design render · © 2026 KFE

High vs Low Aspect Ratio

Safety-factor (q) map of the equilibrium — FreeGS.
Safety-factor (q) map of the equilibrium — FreeGS. canon 2026-08-27 · © 2026 KFE

Low aspect ratio (spherical) raises beta and stability but crowds the center stack; high aspect ratio is roomier but lower-performance. Kronos runs a low A = 2.0.

High A (3–4)
Roomy center column; lower beta
Low A (~2)
Higher beta and stability; crowded center stack
Kronos
A = 2.0 (spherical)
Trade
Performance vs inboard space

Aspect ratio — major radius over minor radius — is the shape decision that most defines a tokamak. It's a genuine trade-off, not a clear win either way.

DimensionLow A (Kronos, 2.0) / High A (3–4)
Plasma pressure (beta)Higher for a given field / lower
StabilityImproved / conventional
Center stackCrowded — magnet + shield in little space / roomy

Kronos chose low aspect ratio (A = 2.0, spherical) for the higher beta and better stability, accepting the crowded center stack as the cost. That inboard squeeze is exactly where being low-neutron pays off — a thinner shield fits, freeing room for the magnet. See spherical vs conventional tokamak.