Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › L0 · Foundation
L0 · Foundation

Transport Simulation Workloads

Solving how particles, heat, and momentum move across the plasma to predict confinement and profiles for both machines.

THE STACK · click to jumpL7Ecosystem & StrategyL6Experience & VisualizationL5Applications & CopilotsL4OrchestrationL3Twin Modeling & AIL2Data FabricL1Control PlaneL0Foundation▲tlmctl▼L0 · FOUNDATIONThe offline compute substrate — multi-physics & batch training.1Cloud HPCelastic burst2Bare-Metal ClusterGPU / CPU3Supercomputingmulti-physics runs4Batch Trainingmodel builds5Simulation FarmGrad-Shafranov · MHD6Object StorecheckpointsMACHINE TIETrains the models that ship UP to L3 — no real-time path to the machine.KRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORFOUNDATIONSHEET 02REV. 2026-08L0 · AI-NATIVE STACK
L0 · Foundation — its place in the stack (left, click any layer) and its internal components (right). Telemetry rises; control descends.

Transport sets performance

Beyond equilibrium and stability lies transport: how particles, energy, and momentum diffuse and convect across the confining field. Transport determines the density and temperature profiles, and therefore the fusion power and confinement, of both machines. L0 runs transport solves to predict these profiles and to close the loop between heating, fueling, and performance.

The transport equations

Plasma transport is described by coupled continuity and energy-balance equations for each species, with fluxes driven by gradients through diffusivities and convective velocities. The central difficulty is that the transport coefficients are set by turbulence, so they are not simple constants but depend on the very gradients they redistribute.

python
# 1D flux-surface-averaged transport (per species):
# dn/dt = -1/V' d/drho( V' Gamma ) + S_n
# 3/2 d(nT)/dt = -1/V' d/drho( V' q ) + P_heat - P_loss
# Gamma = -D dn/drho + n v   ;  q = -n chi dT/drho
# D, chi, v from turbulence models / gyrokinetics

Where the coefficients come from

Kronos supplies transport coefficients either from reduced turbulence models or from first-principles gyrokinetic runs. The gyrokinetic route is expensive and lives among the heaviest L0 workloads; the reduced-model route is cheap enough to sweep. Both feed the same profile solver, trading fidelity against breadth.

The two machines pose distinct transport questions. The breeder's negative triangularity changes edge transport and is a central reason for the delta -0.30 choice; the burner's open geometry couples transport to end losses and the ambipolar potential rather than to a closed-flux edge. The same solver framework handles both with different geometry and closures.

Transport results are the bridge from physics to performance. They set the profiles that feed neutronics source distributions, thermomechanical loads, and the twin's Power module, making transport the workload that ties the rest of the L0 chain to the numbers that define each machine.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage