Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › Mathematical Foundations
Mathematical Foundations

Trajectory Optimization for Scenario Design

A scenario is a time-dependent path in state and actuation; direct collocation turns designing it into a large, structured nonlinear program.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

Designing the whole path

Beyond a single operating point, a scenario is a trajectory: how current, shape, fueling, and heating evolve from breakdown to flat-top and back, or how the burner reaches and holds its potential. Trajectory optimization designs this path to meet objectives while satisfying dynamics and constraints at every instant. It is the offline planner whose output MPC tracks.

text
Direct collocation transcription:

  min  Integral_0^T  L(x(t), u(t)) dt  +  E(x(T))
  s.t. xdot = f(x, u)         (dynamics, enforced at nodes)
       path constraints g(x,u) <= 0
       boundary conditions on x(0), x(T)

  Discretize on N nodes; enforce dynamics via collocation:
     x_{k+1} - x_k = (h/2)( f_k + f_{k+1} )   (trapezoidal)
  -> large sparse nonlinear program in {x_k, u_k}

Direct versus indirect methods

Direct methods discretize states and controls and hand the resulting nonlinear program to a solver; they are robust and handle path constraints naturally. Indirect methods derive optimality conditions (Pontryagin's principle) first, then solve - accurate but delicate. The stack uses direct collocation for scenario design because envelope and actuator constraints are first-class and the sparse NLP solves reliably.

python
# direct-collocation NLP assembly (schematic)
vars = stack([x_k for k in range(N)] + [u_k for k in range(N)])
cons = []
for k in range(N-1):
    cons.append(x[k+1]-x[k] - 0.5*h*(f(x[k],u[k])+f(x[k+1],u[k+1])))
cons += path_constraints(x, u) + boundary(x[0], x[N-1])
sol = nlp_solve(objective(x,u), cons, bounds)   # SQP / interior-point

Feeding the control loop

The optimized trajectory becomes the reference MPC tracks, and its terminal state defines the operating point around which the terminal set and cost are built. For the breeder this plans the negative-triangularity ramp within stability limits; for the burner it explores candidate paths to the ambipolar operating point in simulation, carrying the regime and coil-stress caveats so the plan is understood as a design study, not a schedule for existing hardware.

Trajectory optimization sits between Bayesian scenario search (which picks the regime) and MPC (which executes in feedback), completing the optimization stack from design to real-time control.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage