Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › Mathematical Foundations
Mathematical Foundations

PINNs for Inverse Problems

By treating unknown coefficients as trainable parameters, a PINN reconstructs the breeder's hidden profiles and the burner's potential directly from diagnostics.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

Forward becomes inverse

The same PINN that solves a PDE forward can identify unknown terms in it. The unknown profiles - p'(psi) and F F'(psi) for the breeder, or the ambipolar potential parameters for the burner - are made trainable alongside the network weights, and the loss adds a data term matching diagnostics. Minimizing residual and data mismatch jointly recovers both the field and the hidden coefficients.

text
Inverse PINN objective:

  minimize over (theta, lambda):
    L_pde(theta, lambda) + w_data * L_data(theta)

  theta  : network weights (the field psi)
  lambda : unknown physical coefficients (profiles, potential)

  PDE residual couples lambda to the field; data pins the field.

Regularization is essential

Inverse problems are ill-posed: many profile choices fit the data. The PINN adds smoothness and physical-admissibility priors on lambda - monotonicity, sign, bounded curvature - so the recovered profiles are physical, not noise-fit. This mirrors the regularization in classical equilibrium reconstruction but is embedded in one differentiable objective.

python
# joint field + profile identification (schematic)
theta = init_net(); lam = init_profiles()
for it in range(max_it):
    L = pde_residual(theta, lam) \
      + w_d * data_mismatch(theta, diagnostics) \
      + w_r * smoothness(lam) + w_s * sign_penalty(lam)
    theta, lam = adam_step(L, [theta, lam])   # both trainable

Application on both machines

For the breeder this yields real-time equilibrium reconstruction that is a physically admissible Grad-Shafranov solution by construction, feeding the twin. For the burner it recovers the ambipolar potential profile consistent with quasineutrality from end-cell diagnostics - but with the standing caveat that the operating regime is 166-830x beyond any device, so the inversion is extrapolative and its uncertainty is reported, not suppressed.

Inverse PINNs share the twin's honesty rule: where diagnostics are sparse or the regime is extrapolative, the recovered coefficients carry wide bands and downstream control widens its margins.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage