Skip to content
Technology How it works Breeder — Hyperion Burner — Aegis Burner — MetroVolt AI-Native Architecture Magnets Fuel cycle Safety Roadmap
Solutions AI & Data Centers Defense & Government Grid & Baseload Neutron Detection Quantum
Learn Technical Library
Proof Publications Whitepapers Technical Library Open Science & Reproducibility The Honest Gates
Company About / Mission Leadership Environment Health & Safety Investors Careers Press Contact
3D Model
AI Architecture › MLOps & Learning
MLOps & Learning

Hyperparameter Optimization and Architecture Search

HPO and architecture search run as governed L0 campaigns whose winning configuration is a versioned, reproducible artifact — never an unrecorded manual tweak.

STRATEGY / SLOW ▲ ▼ MICROSECOND REAL-TIMEL7Ecosystem & Strategytelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L6Experience & Visualizationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L5Applications & Copilotstelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L4Orchestrationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L3Twin Modeling & AItelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L2Data Fabrictelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L1Control Planetelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸L0Foundationtelemetry ▲ control ▼open ▸PHYSICAL S.M.A.R.T. GENERATOR PLANTBREEDER · HYPERION1R0 1.2 m · A 2.5 · 16.84 T · δ −0.30BURNER · TANDEM MIRROR2317 T throat · 26.49 T plug · fₙ 5.44% · DEC1 center stack + plasma · 2 high-field plug · 3 expander → direct converterCOLOR GRAMMAR strategy AI-workflow infra/data models reactor/DECLINE SEMANTICStelemetry (µs)controlKRONOS FUSION ENERGYAI-NATIVE S.M.A.R.T. GENERATORMASTER BLUEPRINTSHEET 01REV. 2026-08L0-L7 · 2 MACHINES
The AI-Native S.M.A.R.T. Generator Master Blueprint — eight layers (L0→L7), one control stack, wired to both machines. Telemetry rises in microseconds; control descends the same path.

Tuning as an auditable campaign

Model quality depends heavily on hyperparameters and architecture, but ad-hoc tuning produces models nobody can reproduce. Kronos runs hyperparameter optimization and neural architecture search as first-class L0 campaigns: a defined search space, a fixed objective on a frozen validation split, a reproducible search algorithm, and a recorded winner with full lineage.

The objective is never accuracy alone. For models destined for the machine, the search objective is multi-term: predictive error, calibration quality, inference latency against the L1 edge budget, and robustness across the domain-randomization distribution. A model that is marginally more accurate but violates the latency budget or is poorly calibrated does not win.

Search methods and constraints

python
def objective(trial):
    cfg   = suggest(trial, SEARCH_SPACE)
    model = train(cfg, dataset, seed=trial.seed)      # reproducible
    if latency(model, EDGE_BUDGET) > EDGE_BUDGET:
        raise Pruned                                  # infeasible
    return (rmse(model, val), ece(model, val),
            -robustness(model, randomized_envs))      # multi-objective

HPO campaigns share the L0 compute substrate with retraining and are scheduled against the same budget. The winning configuration is registered and becomes the pinned recipe for future retraining, so a scheduled retrain reproduces the tuned architecture rather than re-searching. The whole campaign, not just the winner, is retained under experiment tracking.

Content reviewed August 2026 · design-and-simulation stage